DEARTH OF A NATION 
Recently
 I came across a Facebook share with a brilliant bit of advice on 
dealing with someone whose views you find reprehensible. It said to, 
instead of indulging your emotional gut reaction and jumping into 
defensive, must-win mode, ask the person one even-tempered question: 
What in your life experience has led to your feeling this way?
What
 a kind, civil—depending on your spiritual persuasion, you might say 
Godly—way of looking at folks’ political rantings during this 
historically preposterous presidential election!
And 
it’s got me thinking: couldn’t we ask that same question of a nation, 
political party or voting bloc? In this election cycle, how much of 
folks’ often illogical though deeply personal feelings about the 
candidates might actually stem from some shared, 
national experience?
          What's the real reason behind so many
          Americans' support of a candidate who
          so obviously embodies the antithesis of
          their true values? 
This
 question, believe it or not, has helped me put the video-game 
candidate’s baffling appeal in perspective. I don’t think I know more 
than a few of his supporters, and of those only one will actually admit 
it. But we’ve all heard plenty from them in the media. 
They
 are quick to draw on a core group of grievances: an economy they feel 
has left them behind; immigration policy they fear is giving away the 
store; and the perceived erosion of law and order—I may have missed one 
or two. They are not just disappointed; they are enraged. 
And
 they blame it all on a party, a president and a former senator and 
cabinet member, who by all credible accounts, when compared with the 
state of the union those leaders inherited eight years ago, have done 
incredibly well by them. 
So what’s really going on? 
What in their life experience has led them to feel this way? For what 
it’s worth, here’s my half-baked theory.
|  | 
| PHOTO: National Park Service via WikiMedia Commons | 
HAMMERED AND HOG-PILED 
On September 11, 2001, a psychotic, all-but-invisible
 enemy broke in and plunged a knife deep into the breast of our country.
 Our government didn’t respond very wisely, but our people and many of 
our institutions responded with courage, conviction and, mostly, love. 
Like a proud kid beaten up on the playground we claimed not to be hurt. 
Hey, is that all you got?
Very, very few of us have ever been in a better place.
But we 
were
 hurt. In our rage and our determination, maybe it didn’t seem that way,
 but with time the reality of that violation—of all we’d taken for 
granted about our strength and safety—broke our hearts and spirits.
In
 the meantime, one U.S. administration did a lot of macho 
saber-rattling—and some big-league lying—to convince us that tracking 
down and killing a few bad guys would restore us to our rightful place 
as the unassailable champion of all that’s right in the world.
To
 prove at least one aspect of our resilience, that same administration 
managed to pull out the stops on some of the industries we hoped might 
help heal the damage to our economy—and perhaps our psyche.
|  | 
| PHOTO: Investopedia | 
Instead, those powerful concerns chose to 
shamelessly exploit the vulnerability of their compatriots. Investment 
bankers, marketers, the media, the defense and security industries, and 
certainly politicians, jumped all over us like still more bullies piling
 on.
Eventually, though, at least one of the US’s 
bedrock institutions—our political system—remained robust enough to 
actually produce precisely the positive change in leadership the country
 so desperately needed. 

At
 last, we had an emotionally mature president who believed a more secure
 future for the country hinged not on our righteous indignation and 
isolationism, but on tough-but-smart diplomacy and courageous leadership
 in building bridges to the rest of the world.
Still, somewhere between 40 and 50 percent of people who participate in political polls apparently think life is insufferably bad.
THE DELUSION OF DEMISE 
On
 the other hand, in the years since September Eleven some Americans, 
most of them sincere, born-and-bred, hard-working, mostly Christian, 
self-described patriots, totally bought that Bush-era illusion of 
control. And they’ve deeply mourned its loss. 
They 
feel they’ve witnessed the gradual erosion—those on the more liberal end
 of the political spectrum might say debunking—of that take-charge, 
regime-change, blunder-then-claim-victory mentality. And in its place, 
an eight-year stint of what they see as the utter betrayal of all those 
misplaced “American Values.”
What’s riled them even 
more is being backed into a corner of “political correctness,” where 
they feel their fervor for law and order in our cities, tighter borders,
 traditional family structure, Christian values and a raft of other 
working-class-white-male principles has been roundly stifled.
Curiously,
 in terms of peace, freedom, opportunity, prosperity and any number of 
other measures, very, very few Americans have ever been in a better 
place. By all credible accounts this great nation has managed to claw 
itself out of one of the deepest holes it’s been in since the Great 
Depression.
https://soapboxie.com/us-politics/14-Facts-About-The-Obama-Presidency-That-Most-People-Dont-Know
Nonetheless,
 somewhere between 40 and 50 percent of people who participate in 
political polls apparently think life is insufferably bad. 
This
 dubious attitude began to see its political expression in the birth of 
the Tea Party, whose single avowed purpose was not to govern, not to 
plan and work for a better future…but simply to block every single 
initiative for restorative, forward-thinking change by a truly 
intelligent, thoughtful, internationally respected, peace-first 
president (who just happens to be the first African-American to hold the
 office). 
LAST HERO YOU'D EXPECT 
So
 now a whole lot of these folks who feel the country’s gone to hell over
 the past 15 years—who’ve been forced to push those feelings under the 
rug all this time—have finally found an escape valve for their 
frustration, a blathering idiot whose only merit as a candidate—or as a 
human being for that matter—is that he represents everything the liberal
 establishment hates.

Donald
 Trump, the least experienced, least qualified, least influential, least
 emotionally sound person ever to run for the U.S. Presidency, has 
managed somehow to tap into all that pent-up frustration and rage. And 
now millions and millions of assumedly well-meaning, yet ill-informed 
Americans have hitched their wagons to his solid fools-gold train.
He's such a total a-hole that it would forever tarnish any kids' or grandkids' dreams of one day becoming president. 
Somehow,
 they’ve responded to his bravado, his pretense of personal success, his
 calculated fear mongering, and the sheer volume of his loose-cannon 
tirades—half expecting, I’ve got to believe, that he’d crash and burn 
before they actually had to vote for him in the general election.
But
 the primaries and the conventions come and go, and—surprise 
surprise—Trump doesn’t. At some level, his backers realize he’s 
unqualified—not to mention, such a total a-hole that it would forever 
tarnish any of their kids’ or grandkids’ dreams of one day becoming 
president. But somehow they keep going, and before they know it Trump is
 all they’ve got. 
BUT ONE MASTER 
So
 profound is their collective insecurity that Trump’s backers fail to 
see that their guy actually represents much of what they feel has rigged
 the system against them. He’s the epitome of the greedy, 
worker-exploiting, risk-other-people’s-money, tunnel-vision corporate 
big shot—the real culprit in dragging America’s middle class to its 
knees. 
Trump has left a bloody trail of employees, 
associates and suppliers holding the bag for his failed ventures. Anyone
 who dares criticize him is crushed with punitive, baseless media 
vitriol and legal counter-claims. Most amazing of all, he openly 
disdains his voter base, suggesting, more than once, that they’re really
 quite stupid.
Trump is the antithesis of nearly everything Jesus Christ represents to Christians. 
If
 these Trump fanatics really want “family values,” their candidate would
 be the very last one to exemplify them. His consistent absence from his
 own family duties, his self-proclaimed extra-marital conquests and 
multiple failed marriages have proven it repeatedly.
And
 if they want “Christian values,” Trump, again, is the antithesis of 
nearly everything Jesus Christ represents to Christians. He’s 
notoriously self-serving, exploitative, stingy, mean-spirited, ruthless,
 unkind, profane…I could go on. And, obliterating the message of Matthew
 6:24, he’s not even torn between “serving two masters;” the way he 
surrounds himself in gaudy symbols of wealth and fame clearly 
demonstrates that he serves but one.
THE DIRTY LITTLE SECRET 
So
 if those soundbite versions we keep hearing of the case for Trump don’t
 ring quite true, what’s the real reason behind so many Americans’ 
support of a candidate who so obviously embodies the antithesis of their
 true values? What’s really going on?
One possible 
answer takes me back to those complaints about “political correctness.” 
Usually, this term means there’s something someone wants to say,
but other folks’ social norms threaten to exact too steep a price for doing so. 
In
 this case, what I believe the hard core of Trump supporters dare not 
say is that they cannot stand having “their” country, or any significant
 part of its culture, run by or benefiting anyone who’s not exactly like
 them: white, male-centric, straight, chauvinistic, at least 
second-generation U.S. citizens.
It's gone far behond what trump backers might want in a president...it's now about shafting liberals (and everyone else) with their worst nightmare.
Trump
 has managed to tap into their long-suppressed sense of victimization. 
He’s become, by his frequent, fear-mongering rants about immigration, 
inner-city crime, women’s issues and any number of other “taboo” 
opinions, a symbol—a mouthpiece if you will—for what these folks have 
long felt, but don’t dare voice anywhere but amongst themselves.
|  | 
| PHOTO: The Economist | 
THE GOD-GIVEN RIGHT 
In
 fact, he’s so emboldened these people that they literally don’t care 
any more who Trump is, what he says, what he does or what he says he’ll 
do—as long as he’s willing to stick it to the liberal do-gooders 
oppressing what they see as their God-given right—in this, the land of 
liberty—to control not just their own lives, but the lives of others. 
There is compelling research to suggest that, indeed, the one variable that best predicts whether a voter supports Trump is 
authoritarianism.
 Authoritarians love to obey; they rally to and follow strong leaders; 
and they respond aggressively to outsiders, especially when they feel 
threatened.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/01/donald-trump-2016-authoritarian-213533
|  | 
| PHOTO: barenakedislam.com | 
So who Trump really is has never really 
mattered. In fact, the more obnoxious he becomes, the more he betrays 
his utter incompetence, the more they love it. It’s gone far beyond what
 they’d ever actually say they want in a president—Trump clearly has 
very little of substance to offer, not to mention many obvious, 
frightening liabilities. 
No, for Trump diehards it’s 
now about nothing more than imposing authority. And to them that means 
closing borders, cracking down on petty crime, dismantling the social 
safety net and shutting up anyone better educated than they. Above all, 
it means punishing liberals, shafting them (and everyone else) with 
their worst nightmare, regardless of the collateral damage.
LOOKING IN THE MIRROR 
Yep,
 a sizable slice of the American electorate is throwing one ugly temper 
tantrum. And the rest of us don’t know if we should be scared, get 
angry, lapse into denial…or if any of this perceived victimhood is even 
real. 
So now, letting that timely Vanzant quote bring me full-circle, the question I ask myself is, 
Is
 my trying to express the raw fight-or-flight emotions I’m feeling about
 Donald Trump and his power-starved mob just fueling in me the very fire
 of fear and pessimism I claim to so despise?
Now 
that I understand the national experience that may have brought Trump 
supporters to their point of view, how is it that the very same sequence
 of events has brought me to such a different one? Is it something in my
 personal life experience that’s led me to those feelings—and to such an
 abhorrence for theirs? Is there anything I can do to change? Do I want 
to change?
How is it that the very same sequence of events has brought me to such a different point of view? 
THE BEST CANDIDATE 
I
 cannot truthfully say that this reflection has led me to fear any less 
the prospect of a vacuous reality-TV star with a violent nature and no 
self control becoming President of the United States. But I am confident
 that there are many, many of my fellow Americans who are thoughtful 
enough to have realized by now that what they thought their candidate 
reflected about them and their lot in life is nothing more than his 
shameless pandering to their frustration and fears.
And
 those who fail to realize that? I still disagree with their insular 
views, but now somehow that judgement feels less personal. They are 
frightened; I know I too can get irrational when I believe something 
strongly enough. And probably most importantly, this understanding 
distances me just a bit from that same national us-versus-them, 
with-us-or-agin-us, winner-take-all mind set that has served both 
Americans and America so poorly these past 15 years.
May the best candidate win.